OK, now you guys have REALLY done it! The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know!
I
HATE when that happens, you know!
(I know you're doing this to me on purpose, Cyber-Sis! You're off sounding like a college professor again... but any information you DON'T give me, had better NOT be on the quiz!) :p
8-4-12 would contain 8% nitrogen, 4% phosphorus, and 12% potassium.
You know that I'm no good at math, BUT... those numbers don't add up to 100! Where is the other 76% of what I paid for?
Why not just
plant stuff right in pots filled with these granules? (I haven't given that much thought, but I don't think I'd try it,
cuz nobody else does ...& you'll probably give me a "logical" answer, anyway!)
Nitrogen is usually associated with leaf and stem growth.
OK, so Nitrogen sounds like a good thing, so I'll leave that one alone.
Phosphorus stimulates early growth and root formation; plus, it speeds up maturity and is involved in seed production.
So, why put Phosphorus in the
rose food at all? My
rose bush roots are already there & the
plants are obviously already mature... (& I've never heard of a
rose bush
seed!)
So you are saying "Potassium" for that last number, while all my containers are saying "Potash". (Safe to assume, I assume, that they're the same thing!) You probably don't know this one: WHY do they confuse the issue by coming up with a different word for that? Anyway, Potassium/Potash sounds like another good thing.
It is always best to have your soil tested to see what your soil actually needs...
I did that today... but I think that's going to be a whole different topic, or I need to have the County Extension office test it for me, because my results, according to the paperwork that came with my kit, shows my veggie garden dirt "deficient" for Phosphorus, "deficient" for Nitrogen & off the chart ridiculous "surplus" for Potassium!
I know those can't be right, because last year I had very happy Tomato, Canteloupe, Honeydew melon, Watermelon, Bell Pepper, Pole Beans, Sugar Peas & Basil plants in that garden, & was still harvesting some of those things on Halloween! (By the way... guess what? If I'd have read everything that came with my Soil Test Kit, I wouldn't have had to start this topic!
All the stuff you said was right there!)
...instead of adding any nutrients that already are there in quantities which may be adequate or more than adequate.
So, what's wrong with "more than adequate"? If I have large
roses already, why not use the 8-4-12, or the 11-6-11 & get HUGE prize-winners? (Do I see one of those
"more is less" answers coming?)
Another thing, maybe just a bit off topic, but not really... Where does Epsom Salts come into this?
(I mean, besides when you're stiff & sore from playing in the dirt & you need it in you bath water!) Right next door here, there's a topic about Epsom Salts, with a link to gardening uses. I looked on my Epsom Salts carton, & there are no numbers there! (If there were, which one would it be?) Do I
need to use it?
You know, this whole thing about
plant food, fertilizers & boosters brings to my mind the issues I dealt with when I raised a lot of chickens, & sold eggs & baby chicks... I refused to use lights to trick my hens into double egg production, & was careful not to feed them chemically enhanced feed, to achieve more or "better" eggs, because (1) I didn't want chemicals in my food, or (2) messing up baby chick development, & (3) I didn't want to burn the hens out before their time. It's almost sounding as though, in much the same way, these additives for
plants have the propensity to do more harm than good, in the long run!
What about that? I sure am glad that Weezie & Jiffymouse have said "there's no such thing as a stupid question around here" because I feel like I just fell off the last Turnip truck!